Continued
Philnews
One interesting portion of your book you indicate that a month after the Balagiga massacre occured, Brig. Genereal Jacob Smith, who was the commander of
the American troops in Samar, in retribution for the attack, orders Major Waller
to take control of an area around 600 square miles and tells him that, and let
me quote this:
"I want no prisoners and wish you to kill and burn. The more you kill and
burn the better you will please me. I want all persons killed
who are capable of
bearing arms against the United States." Then Waller asks Smith: "I would like
to know the limit of age
to respect, sir?" And General Smith responds: "Ten
years!" Now that's quite an interesting exchange right there--I was curious, how
did you come about that exchange?
Bob
Well, it is actually from two courts-martial: one was of Waller who was later
court-martialed for ordering or allowing the execution of a dozen Filipino
bearers, and the court-martial of Gen. Jocob Smith who was actually
court-martialed for giving that order. The jury is out to the extent that order
was carried out, because Waller actually countermanded it to his own men and
said 'we are not making war on women and children' and ordered his men not to
follow that line. Undoubtedly, some men did, but it does not seem to have been
as big an issue at the time. And most people I think, felt as they do today,
that Smith was just insane. He was senile, he was getting on a bit, and he had a
track record for bad judgment and making outrageous comments. He'd already
caused a problem up here in Zambales, just a few miles from where I am now, in
getting involved in local politics. So to put Smith in charge of a very
sensitive area like Samar, is a very curious command decision. I should say also
that people tend to think of the Samar campaign as beginning the Balangiga
incident. Something along those lines was already being carried out, and had
been carried out since March, many months before. And that this polarized the
people on Samar, particularly the mountain people who were the bulk of Lukban's
forces, and increased the opposition to the United States.
So I think one has to be very careful when talking about Jacob Smith's order.
Yes, he gave it. He was court-marshaled for it, and basically he lost his job
for it. The extent to which that order was carried out is questionable. I have
seen people say his orders were carried out to the letter--there's no evidence
for that at all. You will occasionally hear that 50,000 Samarenos died in that
conflict--this is just pure bunk and is totally wrong!
Philnews
Do you think it is closer to 5,000?
Bob
We can only talk in terms of magnitude. You would certainly have to knock a zero
off and I would think its probably at most two and a half to three thousand
people. Its an area that really needs better research. But if one looks at the
population figures that we do know about, very clearly the population of Samar
increased quite significantly between 1896 and 1903, and that increase is in
line with what one would expect. So any losses on Samar were small enough not to
show up in the population figures. Did that stuff happen, yes, sure it did. How
much of it happened, we really don't know. There was lots of burning going on;
how much killing was going on is questionable. Even with Waller's reports, we're
only talking about a handful of insurgents that he claimed to have killed...very
small numbers. And it would have been difficult to find enough people to cause
major massacre. So we're not taking about genocide, and at heart we really don't
know. But certainly, the sort of figures one sees bandied around are just drivel.
They're actually based on two American historians who didn't bother to check
their figures. I actually did go back and check the figures and indeed I was
invited to address a meeting of historians a couple of years ago to discuss this
and I was a bit nervous because here were some of the best historians in the
country (the Philippines), and here I was outlining why I felt that these
figures were very much over-egged. And they were all saying "yup we've had a
problem with this for a long time; we accept what you're saying because we know
that these figures are not right but nobody ever before had been able to put
their finger on it."
NEXT |