The mothballed Bataan Nuclear Power Plant in Morong,
Bataan. Philstar.com/File Photo
ver
the decades we published several stories on the Bataan Nuclear
Power Plant (BNPP). For over 40 years the BNPP in Morong, Bataan has
remained unused. Loans for the Westinghouse-designed plant, built during
Martial Law have been fully paid for more than a decade. And despite its
tremendous cost to the struggling Philippine economy, the plant has
never generated even a single watt of electricity.
We’re publishing yet another article, given the Duterte administration’s
desire to bring the plant online after four decades of laying dormant.
In May 14-16 Sochi, Russia hosted the 2018 Atomexpo International Forum,
an annual event where “leaders of the world nuclear power industry,
representatives of international, national and public organizations,
Russian and foreign companies, key experts in nuclear area” meet to talk
about their industry.
In attendance was Philippine Nuclear Research Institute Director Carlo
Arcilla. In an article published in the Philippine Star on May 24, Arcilla,
“a geoscientist and geotechnical engineering expert,” debunks several
myths about the BNPP.
According to Arcilla, “the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and
Seismology has certified that there is no fault underneath the
mothballed nuclear power plant.” The BNPP says Philvolcs “was built on a
solid foundation of hard rock.”
Also, the BNPP is not in the crater of a volcano. Although Arcilla admits that
the BNPP flanks Mt. Natib which is a dormant volcano according to
Philvolcs.
On the other side of the argument is geologist Kelvin Rodolfo who in
2016 updated a paper he co-authored titled: “Geological Hazards of the
Bataan Nuclear Plant: Propaganda and Scientific Fact.” Rodolfo is
professor emeritus at the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences
at the University of Illinois in Chicago.
In an Inquirer article published 2-years back, Rodolfo points to data
from the US Geological Survey National Earthquake Information Center,
noting that “many earthquakes occurred on Mt. Natib between 1951 and
2016.”
Further, Rodolfo notes that former dictator Ferdinand Marcos “forced the
construction to begin in 1976, even before the natural hazards had been
properly assessed.”
Given strong arguments on both sides of this issue, and the significant
costs involved with starting-up the long-mothballed plant, It behooves
the Duterte administration to find a neutral third-party—preferably
under the auspices of the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)—to
determine the viability of activating the BNPP.
We’d like to hear from our readers. Tell us if you think the BNPP should
or should not be activated.
Published 5/29/2018 |